I got tired of losing money on my own, so I let GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.6 do it instead. Every morning they independently scan sentiment, pull live option chains, and each pick their top 10. You get the union, ranked by combined conviction and delivered before market open. Will they beat the market? Honestly, no idea. But at least the rationale will be well-written.
Not another signal bot. Two frontier AI models run the same pipeline independently, argue with each other's picks, and let you watch the results in real time. Think of it as a very expensive experiment.
Two frontier AI models analyze independently. No groupthink, no peeking at each other's homework. When they agree, you probably want to pay attention.
Real-time quotes and full option chains from Schwab. Both models call tools mid-analysis to look up actual prices instead of hallucinating them. Progress.
Every trade shows both scores, both rationales, and any red flags. Nothing is hidden. If the picks are bad, you'll know exactly whose fault it is.
Ranked picks in your inbox before the opening bell. EOD results at close. Weekly digest on Fridays. You can also just watch the dashboard and judge silently.
No paywalls, no premium tiers, no credit card. This is a live experiment in letting AI trade. You're welcome to follow along and see how it goes.
Every pick is tracked to close. Win rates, P&L, Sharpe, and drawdown are all computed automatically. No cherry-picking, no "trust me bro" screenshots.
The whole pipeline runs automatically. I mostly just watch and try not to intervene.
The system scrapes Reddit (r/wallstreetbets, r/options) for trending tickers and sentiment signals. This raw data feeds both AI models.
GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.6 each receive the sentiment data and independently call Schwab for live quotes and option chains. Each produces 10 ranked picks with conviction scores and written rationales.
Picks from both models are unioned, scored by combined conviction (average of both scores), and re-ranked. The final list is emailed to all subscribers before the opening bell.
After close, the system fetches closing prices, computes hypothetical P&L for every pick, and emails results. Everything is saved to the database and surfaces on the dashboard.
Each model scores every trade 1–10 and writes a rationale defending its score. When they both pick the same ticker, that trade automatically ranks first. When they disagree? Well, that's where it gets interesting.
Primary Analyst
Independent Validator
Combined Score = (GPT Score + Claude Score) / 2
Trades are re-ranked by combined conviction. Claude breaks ties. Both rationales are visible on the dashboard.
* This formula is by no means empirical or derived from something meaningful in quantitative finance. It just felt like it made sense. If two AIs agree, that's probably worth something. Probably.
Completely free. No credit card. No premium tier. Just two AIs doing their best and one human hoping they know what they're doing. Unsubscribe any time, no hard feelings.